tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304028925055779337.post6440421316797018092..comments2010-12-07T01:39:00.741-08:00.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06184766838002769017noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304028925055779337.post-1907420369398243662008-01-16T15:55:00.000-08:002008-01-16T15:55:00.000-08:00On. Or of the dysfunctional chick apparently.<BR/><BR/>You got a longass new title dude.Downtown Chickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06184766838002769017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304028925055779337.post-65574302709141066952008-01-16T14:15:00.000-08:002008-01-16T14:15:00.000-08:00<I>"So you don't believe the story is a social commentary against a quasi-universal truth [?]of[?] society's repression on the American white dysfunctional men?"</I><BR/><BR/>??? "on" or "of"??<BR/><BR/><I>"Oh my God you retired?"</I><BR/><BR/>Tell your God "yes indeed"! I'm a full-time big bad badass bobby boy writer now lookin' loose women, wine and trouble.Bob Pielkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18192584650793363010noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304028925055779337.post-71335864035642035472008-01-14T11:10:00.000-08:002008-01-14T11:10:00.000-08:00Oh my God you retired?Downtown Chickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06184766838002769017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304028925055779337.post-89796162440139133712008-01-14T11:09:00.000-08:002008-01-14T11:09:00.000-08:00So you don't believe the story is a social commentary against a quasi-universal truth of society's repression on the American white dysfunctional men?Downtown Chickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06184766838002769017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304028925055779337.post-73908637143017835162008-01-14T10:10:00.000-08:002008-01-14T10:10:00.000-08:00Ahem, let me put on my professorial wig....<BR/><BR/>Here's one:<BR/><BR/>Amrican men are dysfunctional in intimate relationships. [a generalization]<BR/><BR/>Mr. Luap is an American.<BR/><BR/>So, he will be dysfunctional in an intimate relationship.<BR/><BR/>The Fallacy: he might be....but by accident. The generalization doesn't support the notion that all Am men are dys. The argument is inductive, pretending to be deductive.<BR/><BR/>PS -- I've cast aside my academic robes officially as of Saturday!<BR/><BR/>Yea!!!!!!Bob Pielkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18192584650793363010noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304028925055779337.post-44207031690706064772008-01-14T09:06:00.000-08:002008-01-14T09:06:00.000-08:00What is "the fallacy of Accident" Professor Bob?Downtown Chickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06184766838002769017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304028925055779337.post-62345748881567970352008-01-14T06:33:00.000-08:002008-01-14T06:33:00.000-08:00<I>"Yes, love is very rare these days, or ever (Le Dernier Tango à Paris was made in 1972 so it was the beginning of human history). True love. Not the American sociopsychologically dictated "love" I mean, argh, wimps. "</I><BR/><BR/>You raise a whole host of interesting issues here, LADTC, not the least of which your metaphorical reference to 1972…???<BR/><BR/>Part of the problem with "love" [and with many nouns] is the Greek mindset of categorization. [Thanks Aristotle!!!] Then we attempt to derive specific conclusions from universal premises, thus committing the fallacy of Accident.<BR/><BR/>Egad....PEDANTIC ALERT!Bob Pielkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18192584650793363010noreply@blogger.com